ProblemUpdated 2026-09-21

AI sends buyers to a retailer instead of to you

Because the retailer's page is often the easiest one to link: it states price, availability and a buy button in one place, and it may be easier to read than the maker's. For a brand that sells through retailers this may be acceptable; it should be a decision, not a discovery.

What we see

In answers about real products, the seller's own site accounted for 37% of citations. The most cited hosts outside the sellers' own sites included large retailers and specialist shops — bestbuy.com and rei.com among them — alongside review and reference sites (study).

Why the retailer wins

  • Its page answers the buying question — price, stock, delivery — in one place.
  • It may be rendered on the server and readable without scripts where the

maker's page is not — worth checking for your own products rather than assuming.

  • It carries identifiers from the product feed, sometimes more completely than

the maker's own page.

When it is a problem

  • When the retailer's page carries an old specification or the wrong variant.
  • When the retailer does not sell in the buyer's country.
  • When you sell direct and the retailer is a competitor for the same order.

What you can change

Make your own page the better source for the facts that are yours — identity, specification, what is in the box — and make sure retailers carry the same identifiers. You cannot make a model stop linking a retailer; you can stop it from being the only good source. What a citation does and does not tell you is at /evidence.

Sources

Related

← All pages